Muhammad Law Center

Muhammad Law Center v. the FBI: A Black Man Was Falsely Arrested and Jailed. We Are Taking the Bureau to Court Under Bivens.

Press Release

Muhammad Law Center v. the FBI: A Black Man Was Falsely Arrested and Jailed. We Are Taking the Bureau to Court Under Bivens.

“Ain’t nobody afraid of the FBI. This is a new day.”

Malcolm X, 1964

The Bureau and Black men

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has a long record of persecuting Black people, and especially Black men.

For decades the Bureau surveilled Black leaders, planted informants inside Black organizations, and ran formal programs whose stated purpose was to discredit, disrupt, and neutralize Black political life. It wiretapped ministers. It wrote anonymous letters meant to drive a man to take his own life. It shared the floor plan of a Chicago apartment with local police hours before they shot a 21-year-old leader dead in his bed. These are not accusations. They are findings of the United States Senate and admissions in the Bureau's own files.

The programs were officially closed. The posture was not. Today the Bureau works through joint task forces that pair federal agents with local officers, and the people on the receiving end look very much like the people who were on the receiving end fifty years ago. A Black man is flagged. A bulletin goes out. Officers who have been told there is no basis to arrest him arrest him anyway, and a report is written to cover it. When the case is thrown out, no one is disciplined and no one apologizes. The man is simply expected to be grateful it was not worse. The most recent man is Kendrick Robinson.

The most recent case: Kendrick Robinson

CHICAGO, October 24, 2026: Kendrick Robinson is the latest Black man to be targeted by the FBI. He was falsely arrested and jailed on a charge that did not survive a courtroom. Muhammad Law Center announces that it is representing him in a federal civil rights lawsuit against the FBI task force officer who seized him and the local police who worked alongside that officer. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Mr. Robinson was doing nothing more than going about his day in the south suburbs of Chicago when federal and local officers descended on him. They had no probable cause to arrest him. Their own paperwork said so. They seized him anyway, searched him anyway, and had him charged with a crime he did not commit. He spent more than three months in jail for a crime he did not commit. He was put through a criminal prosecution. He lost time, money, and the freedom to move through the world without looking over his shoulder.

Then the case fell apart. A judge reviewed what the officers claimed against what actually happened and threw the evidence out. The charges were dismissed. The government has never explained why it did this to him. This lawsuit will make it explain.

“We do not see this as an isolated incident, and we do not see it as an accident,” said Hakeem Muhammad, founder of Muhammad Law Center. “Mr. Robinson was not flagged, followed, stopped, and arrested because of anything he did. He was treated the way Black men have been treated by this agency for as long as it has existed: as a suspect first, a citizen second, and a person last.”

Mr. Robinson is not grateful. He is suing.

The Bureau's defense

The federal officer has argued that no one can sue him for it at all. The position of the United States government is that a federal agent who seizes a Black man without cause, searches him, and has him jailed for months on a false report is beyond the reach of the courts.

Muhammad Law Center has filed its response. The law has recognized a remedy against federal agents who search and arrest a man without probable cause since 1971. That is precisely this case. The Center will not accept that a federal badge places its wearer above the Constitution.

“Bivens is the Supreme Court's answer to a simple question: what happens when a federal agent violates the Constitution and Congress has not passed a statute saying you can sue him?” said Attorney Hakeem Muhammad. “In 1971, the Court said the Constitution itself is enough. Federal narcotics agents had broken into a man's home, searched it, and arrested him without a warrant and without probable cause, and the Court held he could sue them for damages directly under the Fourth Amendment. That is the case we are standing on. The government wants to call Mr. Robinson's arrest something new so the courts will look away. It is not new. It is Bivens with a different badge.”

Muhammad Law Center Sues Police for Attacking Black Family in Indiana

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 26, 2024

LAWSUIT HOLDS POLICE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ATTACKING BLACK FAMILY OVER MISMATCHED SUSPECT DESCRIPTION

CROWN POINT, IN – The Muhammad Law Center and EZINNÉ LAW PLLC filed a federal civil rights lawsuit today holding police accountable for an attack on an African American family.

“The police officers claimed they had a description of a 5’7″ Black man who was an alleged suspect for ac rime and used this as a pretext to attack an entire Black family from a toddler, the young adults, and the elderly. An entire black family was traumatized. ” said attorney Hakeem Muhammad. “Our client Airius Reed stands 6’2″ tall – that’s seven inches taller than their supposed suspect. But the police saw his skin color and that was enough. When police are willing to throw a disabled 65-year-old Black man to the ground and terrorize children hiding from their weapons, it reveals the real target was never an actual criminal.  The target was a Black family’s dignity, their safety, their right to exist in their own home without fear.  When skin color is the only matching factor, every other detail becomes irrelevant in the eyes of law enforcement. A Black man seven inches too tall to be their suspect becomes ‘close enough.’ A disabled grandfather becomes a threat. Children become acceptable collateral damage. Today’s America tells us that for police, no suspect description is too wrong when the skin color matches.” 

Co-Counsel Ezinne Adibe added,”This case further exposes a disturbing and persistent truth about policing in America. That all too often, the constitutional rights that should be afforded to all are afforded to some; that all too often, if you’re a Black person in America, you are immediately viewed as a suspect or a threat. Here, children were involved. This is a sad reminder that trauma can be multi-generational. The children were traumatized as well. That is important to mention. We are seeking justice for this family for what they experienced, and we want better policing practices.”

Despite the obvious physical mismatch, officers proceeded to terrorize his entire family, demonstrating how a single racial descriptor became license for indiscriminate violence against every Black person in the home, regardless of age or disability.

The lawsuit seeks substantial compensation and systemic reforms to prevent police from using vague suspect descriptions as pretexts for targeting entire Black families.

About Muhammad Law Center: 

The Muhammad Law Center represents a new generation of civil rights advocacy, prioritizing transformative justice over headlines. Founded by Hakeem Muhammad, the center focuses on dismantling systemic racism through strategic litigation that puts Black people first. The center has established itself as a principled voice for Black America. 

About Ezinné Law:

Ezinné Law is  dedicated to improving the lives of its clients, one case at a time. Founded by Ezinné Adibe Ranger, her practice utilizes an impact lawyering approach to bring about restorative justice that will have far-reaching impact.

The complaint can be read here.

<

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top